
Leo Babauta
Make Your Blog More Powerful by Optimizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio
“Simplify, simplify, simplify.” - Henry David Thoreau (who would have made an excellent blog writer)
How much of your blog is actually useful content, compared to stuff about your blog, about your cat, about what you did today, or about why you’re not posting as frequently as you should?
People come for the useful stuff, but they’ll leave if your Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) is too low.
SNR is a term borrowed from electrical engineering by Usenet, used to describe the amount of real information in a post (or in a forum) compared to spam or irrelevant or false information. You come for the signal, but you leave if the noise level is too high. You don’t want to sort through a bunch of stuff to get that one little nugget of information.
The useful stuff should be jumping out at you, from every corner, and the non-useful stuff should be kept to a minimum. Otherwise, you’ll quickly lose those visitors who you do happen to attract.
How can you keep your blog’s SNR to an optimal level? Here are some suggestions:
- Focus on publishing something useful, every post.
My goal on my blog, and when I write for other blogs, is to write something extremely useful, every time. Now, I don’t always succeed, I’ll grant you that … but that’s the goal. My experience as a reader is that I tend to continue reading blogs that have a high ratio of useful content. That should be your goal — when you’re thinking about what to write, ask yourself how useful it’ll be, and what problem it will solve for the reader.
- Focus on the reader, not yourself.
Related to the above point, of course, but it’s to make a point: too often a blogger will talk about his day, his dog, his boss, his cool new iPhone. Now, there’s nothing inherently wrong with those topics … they can be great topics, and very useful to your reader … if you apply them in a way that will be useful to the reader. If instead you talk about yourself, and what interests you, you are being self-centered … and you’ll lose the reader. Think about the reader’s needs and wants, what problems the reader has, and how your post will help solve them.
- Focus on the macro level. Think about your blog overall — is the overall topic very general and not of much use to the reader? Then you’ll only get a few readers. Be more specific, and think about the theme of the blog — is it useful? If not, you’ll get a lot of noise, because you aren’t starting with a concept that lends itself to focusing on producing a high SNR. Now think about each post: start with a concept for each post, and then make it more specific: don’t just talk about your boss, but talk about ways to deal with a micromanaging boss. That’s useful.
- Focus on the micro level. Once you’ve thought about usefulness on the level of your overall blog concept, and your post concepts, think about it on a paragraph and sentence level. Is this paragraph necessary, or can it be cut out? Is this sentence, or this phrase, helping get the message across?
- Review and revise. Once you’ve written the post, go back over it and review it on the macro and then the micro level. Cut out as much noise as possible. It’s good to revise, cut, edit. Be minimal.
- Use lists. I use lists too much, but I’m a compulsive list maker. You don’t have to do that, but I would suggest you try it out. It allows your reader to quickly find the main points (the signal) of the post, without having to read through all the noise. If the reader wants more, he can decide what to read more closely.
- Cull your archives. Every month or two, you should go back over your archives. This is a daunting task for many bloggers, but it helps tremendously. You might have had a bunch of posts that talked about site updates, or your daily life, that most people don’t find interesting when they go over your archives. They want to find the amazing posts. If a post didn’t do well, perhaps it’s time to toss it. Cut out the noise.
- Simplify your design. Noise doesn’t have to come from just words. Look at every element of your blog and decide if it’s really serving a purpose — for the reader, not for you. Removing elements that aren’t necessary will greatly reduce distractions and allow your reader to focus on what’s important — the message. Every design element should help get that message across, not hinder it.
- Identify the essential. In order to know how to cut out noise, you need to know what signal is. And to do that, you need to know what message you’re trying to get across with your blog, with each post. I like to crystalize my message in a good headline. If I can’t do that, then I don’t really know what I’m writing about. Once you’ve crystalized that message, you know what is essential about the post.
- Eliminate all else. Now that you know what’s essential, remove everything that’s not. I know, it kills you to do that. But really, it will help your reader focus on what you really want him to focus on — the message. Everything else is a distraction — noise. And remember — too much noise, and you lose readers.
Sites that linked here...
6 Trackbacks
Antbag.com » Removing Old Posts: Common Practice?
[...] was reading an article on North x East recently, written by Leo Babauta, that suggests periodically going through your archives and [...]
Jody Sachse » Blog Archive » Distractions, Dreaded Projects, Signal-to-Noise, Water … Oh My!
[...] North x East: Make Your Blog Powerful By Optimizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio [...]
Looking Back, Are Some Of Your Older Post Useless?
[...] Anthony’s post was in response to another post Leo Babauta (who runs the popular Zen Habits blog) wrote on North X East. [...]
6 Ways To Make Your Archives Sing
[...] is partly the point Leo Babauta was trying to make in his recent article for North x East, Make Your Blog More Powerful By Optimizing The Signal-To-Noise Ratio - an article commented on by Anthony at Antbag and Jon at Smart Wealthy Rich. Of particular [...]
8 Powerful Ways To Add Value To Your Blog — BlogoSquare
[...] For a further read: Make Your Blog More Powerful by Optimizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio [...]
modifoo » Blog Archive » SurfFoo for July 20th
[...] Make Your Blog More Powerful by Optimizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio - Yet more tips on improving you blog. [...]
What others said...
18 Comments
Shane said
This is the big question I’ve been tossing around this last week. I’m one step closer to the answer.
Thanks Leo.
Joe Barone said
With every post, you are helping me exponentially! Keep these wonderful articles coming!
Yan said
This is a very great post. But let me add something to it. Many bloggers tend to state statistics and “facts” which necessitate validity of statement.
For e.g. I usually look up your zen habits blog (a great blog by the way) and I see you writing a great deal on various topics. I see you giving out health tip every week to your readers. As a medical student, I see this as being sometimes prejudicious for someone not of the medical community giving out tips to such a large readership. (I’ve seen nowhere on your blog mentioning you are part of the medical community. If i’m wrong, it’ll be my pleasure if you correct me.) What may work for you may not work for others. A pharmaceutical company usually takes 5 years to test out a certain type of medicine before releasing it to the publie.
My point is that many a times I’ve seen bloggers with huge readerships claiming this or that or that something will work for them if they do such thing without any actual proof or test done. If they overcome this, they will grow as a blogger and they will gain better respect in the community.
Btw I hope you take this comment as a positive criticism and not as a rant. This is a great blog and I hope you keep on releasing such great content.
James Mitchell said
Great article.
I especially think #4, #5, and #6 are key. Focusing on your content and your niche are essential. Quality over quantity is the rule you keep hearing over and over. It is very true, unless your blog is about everything and if that’s the case then of course you’d be the exception.
@Yan, although I see your point regarding the medical advice from a non-medical professional. Does it not make sense that he is a ‘friend’ giving other ‘friends’ advice based on experience? After all he does attempt to make it known that he isn’t a specialist. see 16 tips to triple your workout effectiveness where he says:
Leo said
@Yan: Excellent comment, and you’re right, of course.
In my defense, I don’t just make up my health tips. I originally found them from more reliable sources, most backed up by scientific studies, though I don’t claim to be able to interpret their validity.
Also, if you look through my health archives (click on “health tip day” on zenhabits.net), you’ll see that there’s very little info I give there that requires medical knowledge — most of it is simply how to build the habit of eating healthy and exercising, two habits with foundations that I think most of the medical community would agree upon — i.e. cardiovascular is good for your health, and eating things like whole grains, fruits and vegetables, unprocessed foods (as much as possible), foods low in saturated or trans fats and high in good fats and essential oils … things like that are commonly accepted, I think, and nothing that requires a medical degree.
But your point is taken, and I and other bloggers should definitely stay away from basing our knowledge only on personal experience instead of medically accepted knowledge.
Thanks for the thought-provoking comment, Yan!
Jeff Barson said
eeew. Clling the archives may be daunting. I’d be second guessing myself if someone might be searching for how my dog’s hair shorts are growing in.
Amrit Hallan said
This is precisely the reason why some blogs succeed and some don’t. It’s always about the reader because you are writing to be read. If you want a dedicated readership, give them something they are looking for, and possibly, something they cannot have anywhere else.
redwall_hp said
I don’t agree with number 7. I think that posts should be archived permanently (generally).
Ben Harper said
God forbid someone has some valuable knowledge that’s not sanctioned be the “medical community.”
Yan said
Thnx James for pointing this out! This shows clearly the professionalism of Leo. I really appreciate the fact that he takes his blogging seriously.
Thnx Leo for taking my comment positively. I was not aiming the comment directly at you. I was just taking you as an example to point out this fact. I am no professional blogger. But I’ve seen so-called professional bloggers claiming things they cannot substantiate. I’ve read all your posts extensively and I can say for a fact that you are one of the few bloggers who has my respect in the so called blogosphere.
To Ben Harper, I was using the medical community as an example because this is where I am more knowledgeable. Better be safe than sorry for something as important as your health and life.
Keep up the great work Leo!
Markl Wiley said
Wow, Leo and Yan, I can’t believe I witnessed a conversation where criticism was given, received and discussed in a respectful, polite and mature manner. In the ‘blogosphere’ where egos are huge and (I believe) self-image is usually weak that was a refreshing experience. Thanks!
Blog Bloke said
Good stuff Leo, but don’t you think you should pump up the fonts a little. I need all the distractions that I can get at my age
http://www.instabloke.com/2006/08/10-reasons-why-i-dont-like-your-blog.html
Furious Photographer said
I always learn something new from this site. By the way, I love how you list your items! =) It makes reading and learning easier.
Brad Isaac said
Cull your archives.
Wow! what a great idea. Thanks Leo, I never thought of going back through the archives like that.
True, I do have a lot of site update stuff, and troubleshooting garbage unrelated to my blog. Time to take a razor to it!
Sharkyx said
Hehe i bet you would make a good gamer, with your great micro and macro skills and all :). xD
Mohan said
Lol
Also “identify target audience”
If your target audience consists of high tech savvy people, dont give elaborate descriptions. Keep it short.
Bill Canaday said
When I read medical (or any other) advice on the internet, I am fully aware of my surroundings. The internet is no place for the gullible.
The blog I linked to above is a mess, especially in contrast with your list above. Some of it is good writing, most is, politely stated, ‘noble effort’ writing. Some of it is such utter crud that, were it not for posting in the wee small hours of the morning, would never have seen light of day. Still, it is a weB LOG of my development as a writer and commenter of our times and I intend to preserve it intact, warts and all, as a log of my progress and setbacks. It has the further advantage of being 100% either original or attributed writing. I’ve got to go back through and redo some photos, though, because I didn’t understand how to properly attribute them at the time.
“Nice try, no Kewpie doll.”
The ‘NICE’ blogs I maintain (*/gardening and */SEM) get treated differently and I try to be ‘quick with a knife’ with them. I also tend to spend many hours writing and re-writing their posts and pages. Along the way I am learning technique, style and voice.
themisfit said
thanks for this article. very good information.
Now your say...
Add a Comment